Radiofrequency echographic multispectrometry compared with dual X-ray absorptiometry for osteoporosis diagnosis on lumbar spine and femoral neck

Marco Di Paola1,2, Davide Gatti3, Ombretta Viapiana3, Luisella Cianferotti4, Loredana Cavalli4, Carla Caffarelli5, Francesco Conversano1, Eugenio Quarta6, Paola Pisani1, Giuseppe Girasole7, Andrea Giusti7, Monica Manfredini8, Giovanni Arioli8, Marco Matucci-Cerinic9, Gerolamo Bianchi7, Ranuccio Nuti5, Stefano Gonnelli5, Maria Luisa Brandi4, Maurizio Muratore6, Maurizio Rossini3

Published: Osteoporosis International 2019 Feb;30(2):391-402

Highlight:

The innovative non-ionizing Radiofrequency Echographic Multi-Spectrometry (REMS) technique for osteoporosis diagnosis on lumbar spine and femoral neck was evaluated through a multicenter clinical study involving 1914 caucasian post-menopausal women. They underwent a spinal and/or femoral Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA), according to their medical prescription, and an echographic scan of the same anatomical sites performed with the REMS approach.

All the medical reports (DXA and REMS) were carefully checked to identify possible errors. REMS outcome showed a good agreement with DXA: the average difference in bone mineral density (BMD, bias ± 2 standard deviations) was −0.004 ± 0.088 g/cm2 for spine and − 0.006 ± 0.076 g/cm2 for femur. Additionally, the linear regression analysis of the T-score resulting from both methods showed that the two methods were highly correlated, being the Pearson correlation coefficient 0.93 and 0.94 for the femur and spine, respectively. REMS precision, expressed as RMS-CV, was 0.38% for spine and 0.32% for femur. The REMS approach can be used for non-ionizing osteoporosis diagnosis directly on lumbar spine and femoral neck with a good level of accuracy and precision.

 

1 National Research Council, Institute of Clinical Physiology, Lecce, Italy

2 Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Istituto di Fisiologia Clinica (CNR-IFC), Campus Ecotekne (Ed. A7), Lecce, Italy

3 Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine, University of Verona, Verona, Italy

4 Department of Surgery and Translational Medicine, Metabolic Bone Diseases Unit, University Hospital of Florence, Italy

5 Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, Siena, Italy

6 O.U. of Rheumatology, Galateo Hospital, San Cesario di Lecce, ASL-LE, Lecce, Italy

7 S.C. Rheumatology, ASL 3 Genovese, Genoa, Italy

8 Department of Neurosciences and Rehabilitation, Carlo Poma Hospital, ASST-Mantova, Mantova, Italy

9 Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence & SOD Rheumatology AOUC, Florence, Italy

REMS & Osteoartrite

REMS & Osteoartrite

“I vantaggi della tecnologia REMS nella valutazione della BMD in una popolazione con osteoartrite a livello del rachide lombare.” (Caffarelli et al, Diagnostics 2024)   Carla Caffarelli 1, Antonella Al Refaie 1, Caterina Mondillo 1 Giuditta Manasse 1, Alessandro...

leggi tutto
Primo Premio ESCEO

Primo Premio ESCEO

La pubblicazione su REMS vince il premio PAPER OF THE MONTH della Società Scientifica ESCEO   “Longitudinal changes of the femoral bone mineral density from first to third trimester of pregnancy: bone health assessment by means of non‑ionizing REMS technology”...

leggi tutto
Giappone: i vantaggi della REMS

Giappone: i vantaggi della REMS

Studio giapponese: Con REMS la diagnosi ossea ha maggiore certezza clinica "Radiofrequency Echographic Multispectrometry (REMS) can Overcome the Efects of Structural Internal Artifacts and Evaluate Bone Fragility Accurately" Hotaka Ishizu1,2 · Tomohiro Shimizu1 · Yuki...

leggi tutto

    Contattaci

    Maggiori info o prenota una demo.



    Posizione*

    *Campi obbligatori



    Questo sito è protetto da reCAPTCHA, il suo utilizzo è soggetto alla Privacy Policy e ai termini di utilizzo di Google.