Radiofrequency echographic multispectrometry compared with dual X-ray absorptiometry for osteoporosis diagnosis on lumbar spine and femoral neck

Marco Di Paola1,2, Davide Gatti3, Ombretta Viapiana3, Luisella Cianferotti4, Loredana Cavalli4, Carla Caffarelli5, Francesco Conversano1, Eugenio Quarta6, Paola Pisani1, Giuseppe Girasole7, Andrea Giusti7, Monica Manfredini8, Giovanni Arioli8, Marco Matucci-Cerinic9, Gerolamo Bianchi7, Ranuccio Nuti5, Stefano Gonnelli5, Maria Luisa Brandi4, Maurizio Muratore6, Maurizio Rossini3

Published: Osteoporosis International 2019 Feb;30(2):391-402


The innovative non-ionizing Radiofrequency Echographic Multi-Spectrometry (REMS) technique for osteoporosis diagnosis on lumbar spine and femoral neck was evaluated through a multicenter clinical study involving 1914 caucasian post-menopausal women. They underwent a spinal and/or femoral Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA), according to their medical prescription, and an echographic scan of the same anatomical sites performed with the REMS approach.

All the medical reports (DXA and REMS) were carefully checked to identify possible errors. REMS outcome showed a good agreement with DXA: the average difference in bone mineral density (BMD, bias ± 2 standard deviations) was −0.004 ± 0.088 g/cm2 for spine and − 0.006 ± 0.076 g/cm2 for femur. Additionally, the linear regression analysis of the T-score resulting from both methods showed that the two methods were highly correlated, being the Pearson correlation coefficient 0.93 and 0.94 for the femur and spine, respectively. REMS precision, expressed as RMS-CV, was 0.38% for spine and 0.32% for femur. The REMS approach can be used for non-ionizing osteoporosis diagnosis directly on lumbar spine and femoral neck with a good level of accuracy and precision.


1 National Research Council, Institute of Clinical Physiology, Lecce, Italy

2 Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Istituto di Fisiologia Clinica (CNR-IFC), Campus Ecotekne (Ed. A7), Lecce, Italy

3 Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine, University of Verona, Verona, Italy

4 Department of Surgery and Translational Medicine, Metabolic Bone Diseases Unit, University Hospital of Florence, Italy

5 Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, Siena, Italy

6 O.U. of Rheumatology, Galateo Hospital, San Cesario di Lecce, ASL-LE, Lecce, Italy

7 S.C. Rheumatology, ASL 3 Genovese, Genoa, Italy

8 Department of Neurosciences and Rehabilitation, Carlo Poma Hospital, ASST-Mantova, Mantova, Italy

9 Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence & SOD Rheumatology AOUC, Florence, Italy

REMS & Osteoarthritis

REMS & Osteoarthritis

“The advantages of REMS technology in the evaluation of BMD in a population with osteoarthritis of the lumbar spine.” Caffarelli et al, Diagnostics 2024 Carla Caffarelli 1, Antonella Al Refaie 1 Caterina Mondillo 1 Giuditta Manasse 1 Alessandro Versienti 1 Maria Dea...

read more
Paper of the Month

Paper of the Month

ESCEO: REMS PUBLICATION WINS "THE PAPER OF THE MONTH"   "“Longitudinal changes of the femoral bone mineral density from first to third trimester of pregnancy: bone health assessment by means of non‑ionizing REMS technology” Ruben Ramirez Zegarra1 Valentina...

read more
Japan: REMS advantages

Japan: REMS advantages

JAPAN: REMS OFFERS A MORE ACCURATE AND PRECICE CLINICAL DIAGNOSIS "Radiofrequency Echographic Multispectrometry (REMS) can Overcome the Efects of Structural Internal Artifacts and Evaluate Bone Fragility Accurately" Hotaka Ishizu1,2 · Tomohiro Shimizu1 · Yuki...

read more

    Contact Us

    More info or book a demo.


    *Required fields

    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.